MAJOR Betrayals By President Trump This Week

https://truthtube.video/watch/....major-betrayals-by-p

Why are 16,500 Millionaires FLEEING the UK This Year? Because they See What’s Coming

The ship is sinking, and the rats are jumping. We’re living in a kleptocracy with the highest taxes in 75 years, and the government is stealing your money to fund its pet projects and foreign wars. While they tell you everything is fine, the people with the most to lose are getting out FAST.

The hard truth? 80% of the population will just go along with it until their savings are worthless and it’s too late. The system isn’t broken; it was designed this way.

Are you preparing for what’s coming, or are you going down with the ship?

The Kurten Report by David Kurten

https://truthtube.video/watch/....why-are-16-500-milli

The Prime Minister of France has Signed his Own “Political Death Sentence” by Proposing to Cancel Victory Day and a Number of Social Benefits, Writes Politico

Bayrou proposed to deprive the French of vacations, freeze their social security, and save billions of dollars on healthcare in order to save the budget.

But most of all, the general outrage, as the publication writes, was caused by Bayrou’s call to cancel two of the 11 public holidays in France. He named Easter Monday and Victory in Europe Day on May 8 as two potential candidates for cancellation.

Opposition leader Marine Le Pen has already promised to overthrow Bayrou’s government.

New U.S. Assessment Finds American Strikes Destroyed Only One of Three Iranian Nuclear Sites

President Donald Trump rejected a military plan for more comprehensive strikes on Iran’s nuclear program that would have lasted weeks, NBC News has also learned.

WASHINGTON — One of the three nuclear enrichment sites in Iran struck by the United States last month was mostly destroyed, setting work there back significantly. But the two others were not as badly damaged and may have been degraded only to a point where nuclear enrichment could resume in the next several months if Iran wants it to, according to a recent U.S. assessment of the destruction caused by the military operation, five current and former U.S. officials familiar with the assessment told NBC News.

The assessment, part of the Trump administration’s ongoing efforts to determine the status of Iran’s nuclear program since the facilities were struck, was briefed to some U.S. lawmakers, Defense Department officials and allied countries in recent days, four of those people said.

NBC News has also learned that U.S. Central Command had developed a much more comprehensive plan to strike Iran that would have involved hitting three additional sites in an operation that would have stretched for several weeks instead of a single night, according to a current U.S. official and two former U.S. officials.

President Donald Trump was briefed on that plan, but it was rejected because it was at odds with his foreign policy instincts to extract the United States from conflicts abroad, not dig deeper into them, as well as the possibility of a high number of casualties on both sides, one of the current officials and one of the former officials said.

“We were willing to go all the way in our options, but the president did not want to,” one of the sources with knowledge of the plan said.

In a speech in the hours after they took place, Trump called the strikes he directed “a spectacular military success” and said, “Iran’s key enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.”

The reality as gleaned through intelligence so far appears to be more nuanced. And if the early findings about the damage inflicted to Iran’s nuclear program hold up as more intelligence comes in, the United States could find itself back in a conflict there.

There have been discussions within both the American and Israeli governments about whether additional strikes on the two less-damaged facilities could be necessary if Iran does not soon agree to restart negotiations with the Trump administration on a nuclear deal or if there are signs Iran is trying to rebuild at those locations, one of the current officials and one of the former officials said. Iran has long said its nuclear program is purely for peaceful, civilian purposes.

The recent assessment is a snapshot of the damage U.S. strikes inflicted amid an intelligence-gathering process that administration officials have said is expected to continue for months. Assessments of Iran’s nuclear program after the U.S. strikes are expected to change over time, and according to two of the current officials, as the process progresses, the findings suggest more damage than previous assessments revealed. That assessment remains for now the current thinking on the impact of the strikes, officials said.

“As the President has said and experts have verified, Operation Midnight Hammer totally obliterated Iran’s nuclear capabilities,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly told NBC News in a statement. “America and the world are safer, thanks to his decisive action.”

In a statement of his own, chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said: “The credibility of the Fake News Media is similar to that of the current state of the Iranian nuclear facilities: destroyed, in the dirt, and will take years to recover. President Trump was clear and the American people understand: Iran’s nuclear facilities in Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz were completely and totally obliterated. There is no doubt about that.”

He added, “Operation Midnight Hammer was a significant blow to Iran’s nuclear capabilities thanks to the decisive action of President Trump and the bravery of every man and woman in uniform who supported this mission.”

Destruction and deterrence

The U.S. strikes targeted three enrichment sites in Iran: Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. U.S. officials believe the attack on Fordo, which has long been viewed as a critical component of Iran’s nuclear ambitions, was successful in setting back Iranian enrichment capabilities at that site by as much as two years, according to two of the current officials.

Much of the administration’s public messaging about the strikes has focused on Fordo. In a Pentagon briefing they held in response to reporting on an initial Defense Intelligence Agency assessment that concluded that Iran’s nuclear program had been set back by only three to six months, for instance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, talked extensively about the strike at Fordo but not the strikes at Natanz and Isfahan.

U.S. officials knew before the airstrikes that Iran had structures and enriched uranium at Natanz and Isfahan that were likely to be beyond the reach of even America’s 30,000-pound GBU-57 “bunker buster” bombs, three of the sources said. Those bombs, which had never been used in combat before the strikes, were designed with the deeply buried facilities carved into the side of a mountain at Fordo in mind.

As early as 2023, though, there were indications that Iran was digging tunnels at Natanz that were below where the GBU-57 could reach. There are also tunnels deep underground at Isfahan. The United States hit surface targets at Isfahan with Tomahawk missiles and did not drop GBU-57s there, but it did use them at Natanz.

A U.S. official pointed NBC News to a closed-door briefing conducted in late June by CIA Director John Ratcliffe, who told lawmakers that Iran’s nuclear program was “severely damaged” and that several key nuclear facilities were “completely destroyed,” according to an administration official’s description of the briefing. Ratcliffe said the only metal conversion facility at Natanz, required for nuclear enrichment, was destroyed to the point that it would take “years to rebuild,” according to the official, who was authorized to describe some contents of the classified briefing.

Ratcliffe also said that the intelligence community believes the strikes buried the vast majority of enriched uranium at Isfahan and Fordo and that thus it would be extremely difficult for the Iranians to extract it to resume enrichment, according to the official. The United States has not seen indications that Iran is trying to dig out the facilities, two officials said.

As NBC News has reported, the Israeli government believes at least some of Iran’s highly enriched uranium remains intact but buried beneath the Isfahan facility, according to a senior Israeli government official who briefed reporters in Washington last week. The official said, however, that Israel considers the material effectively unreachable, because it is watching and will conduct new strikes if it believes Iran is trying to dig up the uranium. The official also said Israel believes Iran’s nuclear program has been set back by up to two years.

Similarly, even if the targeted Iranian nuclear sites were not completely destroyed, U.S. officials and Republican advocates of the operation believe it was a success because it has changed the strategic equation for Iran. From their point of view, the regime in Tehran now faces a credible threat of more airstrikes if Israel and the United States believe it is trying to revive clandestine nuclear work.

Satellite views show the Natanz nuclear enrichment facility, about 135 miles southeast of Tehran, on Jan. 14 and on June 14, after Israeli airstrikes destroyed multiple buildings.

Asked late last month whether he would consider bombing Iran again if intelligence reports concluded Iran can enrich uranium at a level that concerns him, Trump said: “Sure. Without question. Absolutely.”

Iran’s air defenses have been largely destroyed, making it all but impossible for Iran to defend against further strikes on facilities in the future, the U.S. official said.

“It was made clear that Iran no longer has any more [air defenses], so the idea that they can easily rebuild anything is ludicrous,” the official said.

Read More: https://www.nbcnews.com/politi....cs/national-security

Top NATO Commander Rushing to Deliver Fresh Patriots to Ukraine

WIESBADEN, Germany − NATO’s top commander said he is under guidance to move as quickly as possible in transferring more Patriot air and missile defense systems to Ukraine.

“I won’t go into a ton of details on any of that, I’m not going to tell the Russians or anyone else the exact numbers of weapons that we’re transferring or when those will happen,” U.S. Air Force Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, Supreme Allied Commander Europe, said at the Association of the U.S. Army’s inaugural LandEuro conference in Wiesbaden, Germany, July 17.

“We’re also looking at other capabilities and what those needs are and working on proposals for our political leadership,” Grynkewich said.

President Trump said publicly earlier this week that he intends to ship more Patriot systems to Ukraine.

The commander will soon bring European nations together to work on delivering Patriot and other capabilities, he said, to “look at what’s the art of the possible. This will be tied to being able to sequence what flows into Ukraine now … capabilities that are in Europe can be moved more quickly than something off the production line. The production line can then be used to back-fill the capabilities.”

The United States, which has been using Patriot since the Cold War era, sent systems to Ukraine for the first time in April 2023. Its interceptors went to work immediately, batting off even complex threats like hypersonic weapons.

A total of 19 countries have purchased the Raytheon-made weapon, and there are more than 250 Patriot fire units around the world.

Tom Laliberty, Raytheon’s president of land and air defense systems, told Defense News in an interview in 2024 that the U.S. owns 85-90 of those, with the rest distributed among the other 18 customer countries.

The U.S. Army is slated to build a new Patriot battery to replace the one sent to Ukraine and to secure one more battalion’s worth of systems.

International customers are on the rise, and countries like Germany that also have sent Patriot to Ukraine have ordered new ones to replenish those sent and to bolster their own defenses.

Raytheon’s production lines have the capacity to make 12 fire units a year, which the company views as sufficient capacity to support current and future contracts as they materialize.

At the same time Lockheed Martin is racing to increase its production of the Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Missile Segment Enhancement, or PAC-3 MSE, interceptor.

The company is contractually working toward delivering 650 PAC-3 MSE missiles per year by 2027. It is currently producing roughly 550 a year.

Lockheed is looking at how it might possibly ramp up to 650 missiles a year earlier, Jason Reynolds, company vice president of missiles and fire control advanced programs, told Defense News at LandEuro here.

“What we’re endeavoring to do in partnership with the U.S. government, is to pull that left as much as we can,” he said.

The company is also looking at “the efficiencies and streamlining and doing everything we can to stretch those dollars actually to take that to a higher capacity, upwards of around 750 per year by 2027,” Reynolds said.

The government has not yet officially released the number for a top production level, “if you take that trajectory and you project it forward into the future years, you will see as well north of 1,000 and then even much higher after that,” he said.

While he doesn’t have a good sense of what the numbers will be, Grynkewich said, “I know that my guidance is to get the Ukrainians what they need to defend themselves. So there’ll be more to follow. We’re going to move as quickly as we can on this. A ton of coordination in making it work, but, as I mentioned, we’re already doing the preparation phase for the first tranche of capability to start moving with respect to Patriots.”

URGENT UPDATE: Free Speech Summit July 19-20, 2025, Gold Coast, QLD – New Venue, Same Mission

By Jamie McIntyre

URGENT UPDATE: Free Speech Summit 2024 – New Venue, Same Mission
July 19–20 | Gold Coast, QLD | http://FreeSpeechSummit.com.au

The Free Speech Summit is still going ahead—louder, prouder, and more determined than ever.

Despite relentless efforts by Israeli lobbyists to silence our voices, including:
• The last-minute cancellation of our original 2,000-seat theatre at Star Casino
• Coordinated harassment of speakers, with threats and pressure campaigns
• Visa cancellations of American speakers, just hours before boarding their flights to Australia, after flights and accommodation were already paid…

We’ve refused to back down.

⸻

NEW VENUE SECURED

We’ve now secured a new venue just 5 minutes from Broadbeach, Gold Coast.
This theatre holds only 300 people, so we must prioritize ticketed guests.

To protect the event from further sabotage, the exact venue will only be announced the night before the Summit begins. This is necessary to ensure the event proceeds safely and without interference.

⸻

LIMITED SEATS – TICKETS NOW ON SALE

Over 1,900 people registered, but only 300 seats are now available.
Guarantee your seat now by purchasing a ticket:
•$75 – Single session (Day 1, Day 2, or Awards Night)
•$199 – All-access pass to all 3 sessions
•VIP & Platinum packages – Extra perks including photos with key speakers, front-row seating & more

50 seats will be reserved for free ticket holders, but you must reapply and only if you genuinely cannot afford a ticket or to support independent media. Let’s reserve those spots for those truly in need.

⸻

FREE LIVESTREAM FOR ALL

Can’t make it in person?
Watch it live for free from anywhere in the world.
Thanks to our supporters and sponsors, we’re making the Summit available to a global audience.

⸻

STANDBY REGISTRATION

Want to attend but didn’t get a ticket?
Register for a standby ticket (free) to be notified via SMS if seats become available.
Or come to the venue and wait for a seat to open up between sessions.

⸻

SECURITY GUARANTEED

The Queensland Police have offered full support and on-the-ground security to ensure the event goes ahead peacefully and safely. We’re taking every measure to protect our speakers and attendees.

⸻

A QUESTION WORTH ASKING

Why is Israel the only nation on Earth actively trying to stop a Free Speech Summit in Australia?
What are they so afraid of?

Despite the censorship and foreign interference, we stand firm.
We believe in free speech, independent media, and your right to hear the truth.

⸻

Join us July 19–20 on the Gold Coast.
Register now at http://FreeSpeechSummit.com.au

Because if we don’t stand up for free speech now… who will?

Jason Olbourne, Elon Musk, Lilly, Jake Shields, Alex Jones.

Virtual Nutrition Coach App Market Role of Voice-Activated Coaching

Global Virtual Nutrition Coach App Market size is expected to be worth around USD 1,111.4 Billion by 2033 from USD 248.3 Billion in 2023, growing at a CAGR of 16.17% during the forecast period from 2024 to 2033.

Click here for more information: https://market.us/report/virtu....al-nutrition-coach-a

Queensland Police Offer Full Protection for Free Speech Summit Amid Foreign Interference and Venue Cancellation Orchestrated by Israel Lobby

Gold Coast, Australia – July 16, 2025 — As international controversy swirls around foreign interference in Australia’s domestic affairs, the Queensland Police Service has stepped in to offer full protection and security for the upcoming Free Speech Summit, set to take place July 19th and 20th on the Gold Coast.

The move follows a series of escalating disruptions triggered by Israeli lobbyists and activists, who successfully pressured The Star Casino—the original venue for the summit—to cancel just days before the event, despite over 2,000 tickets sold and 20+ speakers confirmed, some of whom were flying in from the U.S. and Europe.

Queensland Police Stand Up for Public Safety and Free Speech

In a remarkable show of professionalism and neutrality, Queensland Police proactively contacted the event organisers, including independent media broadcaster http://ANR.News, to assure them that full support and venue protection will be provided to prevent any troublemakers or politically motivated agitators from disrupting the event.

“We appreciate the support of Queensland Police in helping us proceed with the event safely, especially in light of the disturbing and growing foreign interference we’ve experienced,” said Jamie McIntyre, founder of the Australian National Review and co-host of the summit.

This reassurance came as a relief to the summit team, who had just secured a new venue after the Star Casino abruptly pulled out following a relentless pressure campaign by Israeli lobbyists to derail the event entirely.

Why Is Israel So Desperate to Shut This Down?

The Free Speech Summit has faced a targeted and sustained attack, with Israel and its affiliated pressure groups reportedly lobbying not only to cancel the venue, but also to interfere with Australian immigration processes to revoke visas of American speakers just hours before their flights. Among those banned were influencers and journalists who have previously criticised Israeli government policies.

Critics are asking: Why is Israel so fearful of an open discussion taking place halfway across the world?

Even more disturbing, Israel’s interference isn’t limited to politics or diplomacy—it appears to be weaponizing narratives of antisemitism by allegedly hiring radical extremists on both sides of the political spectrum to create drama, protest, or chaos at such events. These actions are then used to paint legitimate criticism of Israel’s policies as hate speech, while ignoring the very policies sparking the criticism—namely, the ongoing bombardment and killing of Palestinian civilians in Gaza, including women and children.

The hypocrisy has not gone unnoticed. As one commentator put it:

“It’s not antisemitic to condemn the murder of innocent people. What we’re seeing is a desperate attempt to deflect from war crimes by silencing critics worldwide.”

Australia’s Sovereignty & Democracy in Question

Australians from all sides of the political spectrum are now alarmed at how a foreign government—Israel—can wield such influence as to:
• Cancel a major venue for a private, ticketed event
• Pressure the Australian government to ban American citizens from entering the country to speak
• Create enough fear & disruption that local law enforcement must be deployed to protect Australian citizens exercising free speech on Australian soil

What does it say about Australia’s sovereignty when a foreign lobby group can dictate who can speak & where in a supposedly free and democratic nation?

The Summit Will Go Ahead — Louder Than Ever
Despite the obstacles, the Free Speech Summit is going ahead, thanks to the resilience of the organisers and the support of the Queensland Police, who have committed to protecting attendees and ensuring public safety.

Source: https://x.com/jamiemcintyre21/....status/1945513032282

Trump’s DOJ Says EPA Will Appeal Landmark Fluoride Ruling

The decision to appeal came from the solicitor general at the DOJ, who reports to Pam Bondi and the White House. In February, a federal judge ruled against the EPA, concluding that water fluoridation at current levels poses an unreasonable risk to children’s health and ordering the EPA to address the issue.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plans to appeal a decision last year by a federal court ordering the agency to address the risks of water fluoridation, according to Michael Connett, lead attorney for plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

“Rather than use the court’s decision as an opportunity to finally end water fluoridation (as most of Europe has already done), the EPA will spend its time legally challenging the court’s order,” Connett wrote in a post on X.

The American Chemistry Council, a trade organization representing the chemical industry, and the American Fluoridation Society, a fluoridation advocacy organization that touts its work undermining local efforts to oppose water fluoridation, filed motions seeking to submit amicus briefs supporting the EPA appeal, he said.

Connett told The Defender that the American Dental Association also plans to file a brief.

The EPA said it will file the appeal on July 18, after which the case will go to a three-judge panel in the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals. The appeals court will receive briefs from both sides, along with any amicus briefs, and hear oral arguments before issuing its decision.

The Fluoride Action Network (FAN), one of the plaintiffs in the lawsuit against the EPA, said on X that the appeal was “a very disappointing move by EPA.” “A few months ago, @epaleezeldin went on a public speaking tour with @SecKennedy to address why fluoride needs to come OUT of the water. Now the EPA will appeal to keep fluoride IN drinking water.”

Connett noted that the decision to appeal came from the solicitor general at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), who reports to Pam Bondi and the White House, not by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) or by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has vocally opposed water fluoridation, but lacks the authority to end it.

“Only the EPA has this power, and it has decided, for now, to forego its historic opportunity (as provided by the court’s decision) to exercise it,” Connett said.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publishes recommendations from the U.S. Public Health Service on whether communities should add fluoride to their drinking water and at what levels. However, the EPA sets the maximum levels allowed in water under the Safe Drinking Water Act.

The current maximum allowable levels of fluoride in drinking water are 4.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L), which is many orders of magnitude higher than the currently recommended dosage of 0.7 mg/L.

Even the lower recommended dosage has demonstrated a risk to children’s health in numerous studies, and according to the federal ruling that the EPA plans to challenge.

EPA continues to treat fluoride as a ‘protected pollutant’

In September 2024, U.S. District Judge Edward Chen issued the historic decision in the lawsuit against the EPA, ruling that water fluoridation at current U.S. levels poses an “unreasonable risk” of reduced IQ in children and that the EPA must take regulatory action to address that risk.

At the time of the ruling, more than 200 million Americans were drinking water treated with fluoride at the “optimal” level of 0.7 mg/L.

Chen ruled that a preponderance of scientific evidence showed this level of fluoride exposure may damage human health, particularly that of pregnant mothers and young children.

Environmental and consumer advocacy organizations, including FAN, Moms Against Fluoridation and Food & Water Watch, along with individual parents and children, filed the lawsuit against the EPA in 2017 under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) after the EPA denied their citizens’ petition to reexamine water fluoridation.

During the trial that followed, Chen reviewed existing regulations, regulatory frameworks and current science on fluoride’s risks to children and pregnant women presented through peer-reviewed papers and experts on both sides.

The case dragged on for seven years, after numerous delays by the EPA, and attempts by HHS officials to block the release of the key piece of evidence in the case, a government report on fluoride’s toxicity.

Chen’s 80-page ruling, issued seven months after closing arguments in February 2024, offered a careful and detailed articulation of the EPA’s review process for hazardous chemicals and summarized the extensive scientific data on fluoride’s toxicity.

Chen concluded that the risk to health at current levels of exposure demanded a regulatory response by the agency.

Evidence against fluoride keeps piling up

Since the end of the trial, the body of scientific evidence showing fluoride’s adverse impacts on children’s health has grown. Scientists at the National Toxicology Program in January published a meta-analysis in JAMA Pediatrics linking fluoridated water and IQ loss in children.

The program also published a monograph in August 2024 that found a link between higher fluoride exposure and lower IQ in children.

In May 2024, a study in JAMA Open Network found children born to Los Angeles mothers exposed during pregnancy to fluoridated drinking water were more likely to have neurobehavioural problems.

FAN’s executive director, Stuart Cooper, said the group has long sought to end the “unnecessary life-long and life-altering brain impairment in children specifically due to artificial fluoridation schemes” and the many other side effects to people’s liver, kidneys, thyroid and bones.

For nine years, he said, the EPA has been working against them. “From day one of our interactions with them, they’ve treated fluoridation chemicals as a protected pollutant, likely due to the government’s role in promoting their use and guaranteeing their ‘safety’ for over 80 years.”

Cooper added:

“While the science is clear and the lower court’s ruling was very strong and comprehensive, it’s not necessarily a surprise that the appeal has occurred. Our case is precedent-setting. We were the first to sue the EPA under TSCA. I suspect that corporate polluters who have learned how to manage and influence the EPA to their benefit don’t want citizens groups to use TSCA to force the EPA to regulate harmful chemicals.”

Another plaintiff in the lawsuit, Moms Against Fluoridation, told The Defender it was“deeply disappointed” that the EPA plans to appeal the ruling.

“The science is clear, and our lawsuit’s findings are undeniable: fluoridation is a toxic legacy that must end, like asbestos, DDT, and lead,” it said. “The agency’s plan to appeal only underscores their prioritization of industry interests over the well-being of our children and vulnerable populations. Moms Against Fluoridation will not back down — we will continue to fight tirelessly for the health and safety of all Americans.”

60+ towns and counties and two states vote to end fluoridation

Since the federal ruling last year, more than 60 U.S. towns, counties and two states — Utah and Florida — have voted to stop fluoridating their water, according to FAN.

During that time, there has been an ongoing campaign by the American Dental Association, the American Fluoridation Society and mainstream media to discredit the court’s ruling.

Typically, they assert that water fluoridation is an important, safe and effective way to prevent tooth decay — and that without it, rates of cavities will soar, costing billions. They cite a study published by researchers funded by pro-fluoridation groups.

Yet, overwhelming scientific research shows that fluoride’s benefits to teeth are topical, not the result of ingesting fluoride, and a 2024 Cochrane Review found adding fluoride to drinking water provides very limited dental benefits, especially compared with 50 years ago.

Most media reports also highlight the fact that fluoride is a “naturally occurring mineral.” However, they don’t mention that the fluoride added to water supplies is not.

The fluoride most commonly added to U.S. drinking water supplies is hydrofluorosilicic acid, the byproduct of phosphate fertilizer production. Chemical companies sell the byproduct to local water departments across the country.

Communities that have recently ended fluoridation have found themselves saddled with a chemical that they must dispose of as hazardous waste, per EPA regulations — an expensive and time-consuming process.

Source: https://childrenshealthdefense.....org/defender/trump-